Page 2 of 4

Re: Which one is more horrible?

Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 1:46 am
by partyqueen
daltonio823 wrote:I like the vampire one.
I feel the same as U. I think that if some "red" is added to his white face, that would be more horrible. :lol:

Re: Which one is more horrible?

Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 1:48 am
by partyqueen
MacPhantom wrote:Hail Satin! Lord of fabrics! Prince of cloth!
Wow, so many fans of Satan... :D

Re: Which one is more horrible?

Posted: Fri Sep 03, 2010 9:19 am
by Spookymufu
I didnt really like either

Re: Which one is more horrible?

Posted: Mon Sep 06, 2010 10:16 pm
by partyqueen
Why? Maybe it is not horrible enough? I found something nauseant http://www.tinydeal.com/halloween-haunt ... 10519.html
It scares my sister when she saw it last night...

Re: Which one is more horrible?

Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 9:05 am
by Spookymufu
partyqueen wrote:Why?..
kind of cheap looking, like something you'd find in CVS or something, how about this one?

http://www.halloweenasylum.com/my-lord-devil-mask.aspx

Re: Which one is more horrible?

Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 9:22 pm
by partyqueen
Also Satan? But it is full over the head, and not cheap.

Re: Which one is more horrible?

Posted: Tue Sep 07, 2010 9:57 pm
by Spookymufu
partyqueen wrote:Also Satan? But it is full over the head, and not cheap.
yes, yes, and true

Re: Which one is more horrible?

Posted: Wed Sep 08, 2010 10:13 am
by Midnite Shadow
Maybe you could get both and then alternate wearing them to keep people off balance...

They are both inexpensive and I guess it depends on the rest of your costume...

Re: Which one is more horrible?

Posted: Fri Sep 10, 2010 9:14 pm
by partyqueen
Midnite Shadow wrote:Maybe you could get both and then alternate wearing them to keep people off balance...

They are both inexpensive and I guess it depends on the rest of your costume...
Yes, you are right. I can get both and give them to my brother. Or just put them into the house or hang them on the wall at the night, lol. For myself, I think I would not dress up a Satan or a vampire on that day. :mrgreen:

Re: Which one is more horrible?

Posted: Wed Sep 15, 2010 11:05 am
by Midnite Shadow
partyqueen wrote:
Midnite Shadow wrote:Maybe you could get both and then alternate wearing them to keep people off balance...

They are both inexpensive and I guess it depends on the rest of your costume...
Yes, you are right. I can get both and give them to my brother. Or just put them into the house or hang them on the wall at the night, lol. For myself, I think I would not dress up a Satan or a vampire on that day. :mrgreen:

And why not? It is Halloween after all...not an affiliation with Satan or Vampires...our government is a lot worse :roll:

Re: Which one is more horrible?

Posted: Wed Sep 15, 2010 8:51 pm
by MacPhantom
Midnite Shadow wrote:And why not? It is Halloween after all...not an affiliation with Satan or Vampires...our government is a lot worse :roll:
Really!! How dare they try to cut taxes for 95% of the country!! What are they thinking?!? :x

Re: Which one is more horrible?

Posted: Wed Sep 15, 2010 9:10 pm
by Spookymufu
MacPhantom wrote:
Midnite Shadow wrote:And why not? It is Halloween after all...not an affiliation with Satan or Vampires...our government is a lot worse :roll:
Really!! How dare they try to cut taxes for 95% of the country!! What are they thinking?!? :x
unfortunately, it isnt the 95% who actually create jobs :roll:

Re: Which one is more horrible?

Posted: Wed Sep 15, 2010 9:19 pm
by MacPhantom
Spookymufu wrote:
MacPhantom wrote:
Midnite Shadow wrote:And why not? It is Halloween after all...not an affiliation with Satan or Vampires...our government is a lot worse :roll:
Really!! How dare they try to cut taxes for 95% of the country!! What are they thinking?!? :x
unfortunately, it isnt the 95% who actually create jobs :roll:
Silly me. I forgot that when a millionaire gets an extra hundred thousand dollars in tax cuts and puts it in the bank, it creates loads of jobs. Just like it did the last time those millionaires got an extra hundred thousand dollars.

Gringotts Goblins everywhere celebrate the job creation brought about by tax cuts for millionaires! Because, you know, they're the ones who have suffered the most during this recession. The millionaires. Not the goblins. :roll:

Re: Which one is more horrible?

Posted: Wed Sep 15, 2010 9:57 pm
by Spookymufu
MacPhantom wrote:
Spookymufu wrote:
MacPhantom wrote: Really!! How dare they try to cut taxes for 95% of the country!! What are they thinking?!? :x
unfortunately, it isnt the 95% who actually create jobs :roll:
Silly me. I forgot that when a millionaire gets an extra hundred thousand dollars in tax cuts and puts it in the bank, it creates loads of jobs. Just like it did the last time those millionaires got an extra hundred thousand dollars.

Gringotts Goblins everywhere celebrate the job creation brought about by tax cuts for millionaires! Because, you know, they're the ones who have suffered the most during this recession. The millionaires. Not the goblins. :roll:
like it or not but people with the money create the jobs and it isnt just millionaires, remember DumBamas 250k cap? well, a lot of small business owners make more then 250k, and they also create jobs when they expand the business and if they arent getting the cuts they cant expand, it's a proven fact over and over and DumBama cant change that no matter how much he'd like to have a complete nanny state.....

Re: Which one is more horrible?

Posted: Wed Sep 15, 2010 10:09 pm
by MacPhantom
Spookymufu wrote: like it or not but people with the money create the jobs and it isnt just millionaires, remember DumBamas 250k cap? well, a lot of small business owners make more then 250k, and they also create jobs when they expand the business and if they arent getting the cuts they cant expand, it's a proven fact over and over and DumBama cant change that no matter how much he'd like to have a complete nanny state.....
It isn't a question of liking it or not liking it. It's factually inaccurate. People who own small business do not make over 250k. And people in that tax bracket do not reinvest the money to create jobs; they invest it to create more personal wealth. When middle-income earners who live on budgets get a tax break, they spend it on things they couldn't otherwise afford. That puts the money back into the economy, creating a demand for goods and services, and creating jobs. How these guys convince you to vote against your own economic interests and on behalf of those poor millionaires who need you to defend them from paying their fair share, I'll never understand.